Skip to main content
London Borough of Brent Home

No One Wins With This Proposed School Move to HA9

From "Consultation on relocation of Islamia Primary School from September 2024"

Go to the project

How did Brent Council come to make these two proposals? Did one council worker look at a map of Brent, see the empty lot on Strathcona and say, 'Oh, here's an empty building! Let's move Islamia School there!'

How can you make a proposal like this when the current infrastructure is inadequate and dangerous? Cars park on both sides of Carlton Ave East and Windermere Avenue and there is constant congestion, the 223 buses struggle to pass each other in opposite directions, the traffic created at school times is dangerous to everyone, cars honk, there is road rage and people drive on the pavement. This in itself makes the site of Strathcona unthinkable and unacceptable as a suitable location for a new school (not even mentioning Strathcona itself).

This in itself is THE reason not to move the school here. It's not a safe location for anyone - children, parents, local residents, including local children who seem to have been forgotten in this proposal.

Parents will have to drive or be forced to spend too long on public transportation plus a long walk from South Kenton station or an even longer walk or the 223 bus from Preston Road station (already overcrowded at school times). How does this benefit these young primary school children or their parents? Should they have to wake up more than an hour earlier in the morning and get home an hour or more later after school? These are young primary school children.

420 pupils where some are from the same family makes me estimate that there will be a minimum of 150 extra cars trying to go up and down Carlton Ave East and/or Windermere Avenue twice a day. It doesn't work now!

How can Brent consider moving a school without FIRST considering the road/traffic system? You can't 'fix it' after the school moves - and there's no way to fix it at all. No one from the Streets team came to speak at the consultation. I hear the plea from some of these poor parents from the school saying they're happy to take their children anywhere so their children can attend this school. After a week of travelling to this site, even the most committed will change their minds because of both their and their children's mental health, lack of sleep and stress levels.

What about the increase in air pollution for local children who are walking to school?

I'm only repeating what everyone else is saying - nothing here is new.

How can 'option 2' be to close the school? How can Brent even ask residents and parents to make this choice? Who came up with this insulting option?

Was this proposed move the genius idea of one person at Brent? How can it be supported by others in the council, none of whom live in this area obviously or they wouldn't have put this option forward or supported it.

The real question is, despite all the opposition from parents and most (if not all) local residents, has Brent Council already made the decision to move the school to Strathcona and are just wasting our time with this consultation and insulting everyone involved in the process?

Islamia School deserves a suitable site for their school and this is not it. Brent Council needs 'Option 3'.

Comments(4)

Commenting is not possible because this project is currently not active.
Most recent comments have loaded.
Please see the agenda pack for the Council's Cabinet meeting for Monday 17 October, item 5.2 on page 8, including: "As a result of the concerns expressed the petitioners advised they were calling on the Council to withdrawn the current option identified in relation to the Strathcona site in order identify a more local, safer and fair solution for provision of the school. In responding, Councillor Butt, as Leader of the Council, advised the petitioners that whilst noting the concerns expressed and willing to work with the school and parents in seeking to secure future provision on an alternative site, there was a need to recognise the limited range of options available. In terms of the South Kilburn site, he advised this was not a viable option in terms of both timing and its future allocated use as part of the existing South Kilburn regeneration masterplan." https://democracy.brent.gov.uk/documents/g7107/Public%20reports%20pack%20Monday%2017-Oct-2022%2010.00%20Cabinet.pdf?T=10
    Profile of Karen D
    Posted by:Karen D
    4 years ago
    @Alan Henness Thank you for sharing the link. What is the information telling us other than that the Strathcona site is the only site being considered because South Kilburn won’t open until 2026? At the recent consultation at Preston Park it appeared as though nothing has progressed for the better although a couple of good suggestions were made: 1) The purchase of an unused post office building in the Kilburn area that could be redeveloped. 2) Brent Council could ask the Yusuf Islam Foundation to extend its notice period to 2026 when the South Kilburn site will be ready. Please let me know if I’m missing something. It looks like the decision has been made.
      @Karen D I think there have been previous discussions within the Council on this but I don't have a link to them at the moment. You may want to browse through previous Cabinet, Council and school committee meeting minutes and reports. If I remember correctly, the Yusuf Islam Foundation is unwilling to consider any further extension.
        Profile of J. Guled
        Posted by:J. Guled
        4 years ago
        Dear Karen D. I salute you. Thank you for mentioning the parents and the children. We do not want to go to Strathcona. Islamia's children have been on a split site without canteen and without proper playground for years. When other schools are offered a new state of the art buildings we are sent to an area where our children will become a nuisance simply because people cannot make decisions in the best interest of the communities they serve. Appalling.
        • 1 like

        Share

        Posted by

        Profile of Karen DKaren D on 15 November 2022

        Current status

        proposed